Andrew Mitchel LLC

International Tax Blog - New and Interesting International Tax Issues


Guide to Tax Court Docket Suffixes

2025-06-30

The Tax Court assigns docket numbers to cases before the court. For example, the docket number for the recent case of AbbVie, Inc. v. Commr., 164 T.C. No. 10, is:

2597-23

The last two digits are the year the petition was filed, and the numbers before the dash are incremental numbers assigned as the petitions come in. Some docket numbers have letter suffixes.

Summary Opinions (S Suffix)

The recent case of Smith v. Commr., T.C. Summary Opinion 2025-6, has a docket number of:

372-23S

The "S" suffix indicates that the case was heard pursuant to the ["small"] provisions of Code §7463 (disputes involving $50,000 or less).[1] The Tax Court website has over 3,000 opinions with docket numbers having an "S" suffix, with the first of these opinions being published in 2001.[2]

Pie chart of S suffix opinions

CDP Hearings (L Suffix)

The "L" suffix indicates the opinion deals with the review of a collection due process ("CDP") hearing under Code §6320. The Tax Court website has over 2,000 opinions with docket numbers having an "L" suffix, with the first of these opinions being published in 2000.[3]

Pie chart of L suffix opinions

Some opinions deal with small cases and CDP hearings. The docket numbers for these have a suffix of "SL". There are less than 200 of these opinions on the Tax Court website.

Whistleblowers (W Suffix)

The "W" suffix is for whistleblower claims filed under Code §7623. The Tax Court website has fewer than 100 opinions with docket numbers having a "W" suffix, with the first of these opinions being published in 2010.[4]

Pie chart of W suffix opinions

Tax Exempt Orgs (X Suffix)

The "X" suffix is for tax exempt organizations under Code §501(c)(3). The Tax Court website has fewer than 60 opinions with docket numbers having an "X" suffix.

Pie chart of X suffix opinions

Retirement Plans (R Suffix)

The "R" suffix is for retirement plans. The Tax Court website has fewer than 30 opinions with docket numbers having an "R" suffix.

Pie chart of R suffix opinions

Certifications for Passport Actions (P Suffix)

The "P" suffix is for IRS certifications of seriously delinquent tax debts to the Secretary of State for action with respect to denials of passports under Code §7345. The Tax Court website has 13 opinions with docket numbers having a "P" suffix, with the first of these opinions being published in 2020.[5]

Pie chart of P suffix opinions

PLR Disclosures (D Suffix)

There are only two opinions on the Tax Court website with docket numbers having a "D" suffix:

  • Anonymous v. Commr., 134 T.C. 13 (2010) and
  • Anonymous v. Commr., 145 T.C. 246 (2015).

Both of these opinions deal with public disclosure of written determinations (e.g., PLRs) under Code §6110.

It would seem that the Tax Court may be inadvertently revealing the name of the taxpayer in the first of the two anonymous opinions (docket number (28246-07D). If you go to https://dawson.ustaxcourt.gov/, click on the "opinion" tab, and paste 28246-07D into the docket number field, the case title is:

Millennium Multiple Employer Welfare Benefit Plan and Millennium Marketing Group

If you click through to see the opinion itself, it comes up as Anonymous v. Commr. I presume that the case title is the name of the "anonymous" taxpayer.

Percentages By Opinion Type and By Docket Suffix

Below are percentages of all opinions by type and by docket suffix for opinions published from 1996 to 2024.

Pie chart of all types of opinions

Pie chart of all docket types


  1. There is no official published guide as to the meanings of the suffixes. The descriptions in this blog post are based on a review of the opinions containing the suffixes. Docket suffixes S and L are briefly mentioned in IRM 35.3.23.3, and docket suffixes are also mentioned on page 3 of the Tax Court DAWSON Public Guide.

  2. The earliest summary opinion published on the Tax Court website is Shapiro v. Commr., T.C. Summary Opinion 2001-4. Summary Opinions 2001-1 through 3 were published by the Tax Court, but are not included on its website.

  3. Moore v. Commr., 114 T.C. 171 (2000).

  4. Cooper v. Commr., 135 T.C. 70 (2010).

  5. Ruesch v. Commr., 154 T.C. 289 (2020).

Tags: Statistics